• 5.0 out of 5 stars


    • Written by Charlie E

    I was impressed immediately with these headphones. The pairing itself was effortless, but I was a little worried on listening to the first song considering my previous experiences with Bluetooth headphones. Looking back, I had absolutely no reason to worry. The headphones deliver a wonderful sound quality. Best of all, however, was the noise cancellation. I was sitting on my couch while my family talked and watched TV, and couldn’t hear a word they were saying. The range is also exceptional. I can pair the headphones, and be anywhere in the house and have no disparities in sound. If you are on the fence as to buy the Solo3 or the Studio3, coming from a person who has heard both, buy the Studio3. The Solos have no noise cancellation, and they feel uncomfortable and awkward on your ears. The Studios cover up your entire ears, and (in my opinion) deliver a better sound quality than the Solos. They are $50 more, but for the quality difference it’s worth it, no doubt. Packaging was easy to take apart, and it was easy to understand. The one flaw I found with these headphones was the carrying case that came with them. The case is barely big enough to fit the headphones, and it would be great if the case could expand in size to include space for the charger and audio cord. I highly recommend to anyone who wants a pure sound and great functionality.

    4 of 4 people found this useful

  • 2.0 out of 5 stars

    Sound is OK but the On/Off lags too much...

    • Written by David C from Duvall

    These are a quality build headphone, sound good etc. They dont get 5 stars for these three reasons...
    Always a pain to put them on and hit the on/off button and expect them to pair and play in like 2 seconds or less. Problem is the boot up lag is so long you press on/off again turning them off. Only to start the process over again. They need to make a sound the instant after you press the on button.
    Reason they lost another star - They charge with micro usb. Ohhhh what other Apple smartphone has used micro usb in the past 11 years? None. Wth - these should be charged with a lightning cable so they interop with all my Apple phone chargers. Wish they would turn on noise canceling without 3 minute auto shutoff. If you dont pair them on BT and just want noise canceling feature you have to plug in the audio cable into your wireless headphones or they shutoff in about 3 minutes. Ill ding them a 3rd star for this broken scenario.

    1 of 6 people found this useful

  • 5.0 out of 5 stars

    First wireless headphones I love

    • Written by Carl R R from Portland

    I've had various Jaybird wireless headphones and they were fine. Compared to those, these Beats are significantly better connection wise. I'm fairly certain that Class 1 Bluetooth and the W1 chip are what make these headphones fantastic. At the end of the day audio quality is important but I care more about a solid, fast, long range connection. With both my iPhone XS and MacBook Pro these headphones stay connected throughout my entire property. Through walls, inside, outside, second floor, etc. There is next to no lag so watching videos is pleasant. The volume and play/pause/answer button seem to work on both iOS and macOS. Beats have always seemed low value, but if these headphones hold up I suspect I'll stick with the brand.

    3 of 3 people found this useful

  • 4.0 out of 5 stars

    Great Headphones

    • Written by Kevin K from Mount Vernon

    I had the original Beats Studio, the big and bulky silver ones with the red wire, and I liked them a lot. Great for studying in college and what not. However, not great for moving around because of the wire.

    These new Beats are better in every conceivable way. If you are a member of the Apple ecosystem like myself, they are a no-brainer. They connect seamlessly to all your devices, sound great, and have super intuitive controls on the side of the headphones. I can't compare sound quality or noise cancelling to Bose or Sony, but I take the bus to work every morning and the ANC really drowns out the noise incredibly effectively.

    One final note, the bass on the older versions of the Beats was very loud and bulky, and made even little things like listening to podcasts a little uncomfortable. The sound balance on these is wonderful.

    34 of 35 people found this useful

  • 5.0 out of 5 stars

    Much better than I expected

    • Written by Sang Hun L from Regina

    I was concerned about sounds quality but decided to get these after reading reviews from CNET and consumer report. I am very satisfied with my purchase. Highly recommend!

    14 of 18 people found this useful

  • 3.0 out of 5 stars

    Purely Wasted Potential

    • Written by Michael D from Brick

    Sorry Beats, you blew it on sound. It’s not exciting enough to be a fun headphone nor is it clean enough to be an audiophile-grade headphone. Instead, it is in an awkward consumer-compromised middle ground.

    Studio3 has a sub-bass roll-off that makes the bass presentation too focused on the upper bass, which leads to the bass lacking the fullness that would give it impact and body. This mid/upper-bass emphasis can add weight to certain bass notes, but on a whole leaves the bass lacking the emotion and definition that would be expected. Unfortunately, the mid-range can come off as muddy and slightly cluttered. There is a sense of clarity that is missing on Studio3.

    Beats took three steps back after Solo3 turned out to absolutely exceed every expectation I had for them, and BeatsX punched above its weight as a wireless headphone with performance that competed with wired headphones at the same price point.

    Studio3 is iterative rather than innovative, and after four years that is not enough.
    Purely wasted potential.

    18 of 34 people found this useful

  • 5.0 out of 5 stars


    • Written by Otis V from Axams

    I realy like the apple beats sutio 3

    18 of 42 people found this useful

  • 2.0 out of 5 stars

    Poor sound quality; poor noise cancellation; uncomfortable

    • Written by Pavel Z from Novouralsk

    Sound quality: the bass is ridiculously overwhelming, as usual for Beats. It's very muddy, not "punchy" at all, since it causes the earcup to resonate and also drowns out all other frequencies, e.g. vocals. You can easily find a pair of headphones that handles loud bass much better, without resorting to the "Bass Reducer" EQ setting. Speaking of vocals (heh), the frequency response of this pair doesn't really favor vocals and guitars.

    Active noise cancellation: it kinda works, but there is a huge obvious flaw. The ANC microphone picks up and _amplifies_ wind noise right into your ears. It's also very sensitive, so even the slightest movement of air (e.g. from a brisk walk) is enough for it to sound like there's a hurricane raging around you. It wasn't a problem with 3 other different noise cancelling headphone models I've used.

    Comfort: earcups are relatively small and exert a lot of pressure on your head. This might be uncomfortable for you, it is for me. They also don't rotate when folded.

    13 of 44 people found this useful

  • 1.0 out of 5 stars

    I really wanted to like these

    • Written by laci a S from coeur dalene

    They seem great, controls are cool, the gold is gorgeous. They're really uncomfortable, they don't fit all the way over your ears, they don't cancel any noise, they have a high pitched tone in the left ear when music isn't playing, and the case is trash. I'm sad to return these as I have to find a better pair.

    36 of 95 people found this useful

  • 4.0 out of 5 stars

    Great sound with some mismatched accessories.

    • Written by Kennard Y from Apison

    For reference, I own Bose QC35, Sony MDR-1000x and the new Beats Studio3 (I just sold a gen 2 Studio Pro) and I sit on the living room floor, entertaining my wife with testing and comparing these headphones. The new Beats (after a long break in) sound pretty much like the gen 2’s but the ANC actually works. It’s not as good as the Bose or the Sony but it’s pretty good in most environments. Personally, I think the Beats has the best sounds for the wide variety of music that I listen to and I do like a lot of bass to come through in my home and mobile audio set ups. Since I like the sound of the Beats the most, I can give up a little ANC here and there. One of my tests is vacuuming the floors. In the past, I could never use my beats, I’d have to use the Bose QC’s but now, I can use the Studio3! They are 85% of the Bose but close enough to listen to music with the vac wailing away. Something I find maddening is that Beats provides us with a headphone cord that has a 90º angle where it plugs into the source. Well, since we have to use the idiotic lightning to 3.5mm dongle with the 90º plug the two shapes fight with each other (SJ could have never allowed such a mismatch!) To solve it, I got a straight cord, with iPhone controls from another retailer. Another irritant is that there is barely enough room in the egg shell case to hold a charging and 3.5mm cord. All my other headphones come with some form of cable management pocket, not the Beats (old or new versions). I was hoping that they would add that. I do like the fast fuel, it works as promised. Another dislike is the depth of the ear cups. They are so shallow that my small ears touch the inside! Back to the sound, it’s rich and full with deep, but not ridiculous, bass. I could go on and on but if you like the sound profile of the Beats, get the Studio3. The ANC actually works this time around!!

    98 of 108 people found this useful

  • 2.0 out of 5 stars

    Solos Sound Better

    • Written by Jonathan R from Vermillion

    I just received my Beats Studios today and I instantly wanted to see how they sounded compared to the Beats Solos I already own. Sadly I was disappointed because personally I think the Beats Solos sound better than the Studios because the Solos are able to go much louder than the Studios. I don't know if this just happens to be with the pair of Studios I received or with all of them in general, but it sort of bugs me that I'll be using my Solos more often then my Studios even though the Studios costed much more. If the Studios were the first Beats headphones I've ever owned, then I would've liked them much more since I wouldn't have been able to compare them to the Solos.

    13 of 36 people found this useful

  • 5.0 out of 5 stars

    Better than Bose

    • Written by Lasse Hammer P from Brabrand

    I already owned the Bose QC35 when getting these, so here is my comparison between the two:

    - The Beats offer far greater wireless range and stability along with easier pairing and switching between devices.
    - They both have similar battery life with ANC turned on (~20 hours) but the beats offer 20 additional hours with ANC off.
    - The sound profile is different between the two, but they both sound great.
    - The ANC is good on both headphones. In my experience the QC35's ANC is eliminating more noise immediately
    after being turned on, while the Beats ANC is supposed to be adaptive.
    - They both have similar controls on the headset but Beats also allow you to toggle ANC on and off.
    - You configure the Bose headphones through an app. The Beats are completely integrated with iOS like the AirPods.
    - Both have similar build quality. The Beats look better but The QC35's offer slightly better comfort. I noticed some ear/top of head pressure with the Beats.

    In short: I prefer the Beats.

    278 of 302 people found this useful