We believe in accountability - for our suppliers and for ourselves.


An auditor inspects safety documents and permits in a factory in Shenzhen, China.

By vigorously enforcing our Supplier Code of Conduct, we ensure that our suppliers follow the same principles and values we hold true. We collaborate with experts in areas such as human rights and the environment to conduct comprehensive, in-person audits deep into our supply chain. When we uncover problems, we work with our suppliers to fix them

Highlights from our 2014 Report

Conducted 451 audits at all levels of our supply chain, a 51 percent increase from 298 audits in 2012.

These audits covered facilities where nearly 1.5 million workers make Apple products.

Publicly released more than 100 pages of comprehensive requirements behind our Supplier Responsibility Standards for the first time.

View all 2014 highlights

Responsibility throughout our supply chain.

The depth and breadth of our supplier responsibility program is illustrated by how we monitor the many suppliers responsible for producing the camera module in iPhone 5s. From the manufacturer of the smallest parts to the final assembly facility, every supplier is accountable for upholding our Supplier Code of Conduct.

Strengthening the Apple Supplier Code of Conduct and Supplier Responsibility Standards.

Historically, Apple has had one of the toughest Supplier Codes of Conduct in the electronics industry. Yet each year we raise the bar higher. These strict requirements communicate our expectations of how responsible global supply chains should operate.

For the first time, we’re publicly releasing our updated Supplier Responsibility Standards (PDF) — more than 100 pages of comprehensive requirements our suppliers must follow to do business with Apple. We’ve made our high-level Code of Conduct (PDF) available since 2005, but we thought it was important to give stakeholders full access to the details. Our Standards show the specific requirements our suppliers must follow in 20 key areas under labor and human rights, health and safety, environment, management systems, and ethics. We’ve also expanded our Standards by including requirements for student workers, ergonomic breaks, boundary noise, dormitory space and occupancy, emergency preparedness, responsible sourcing of minerals, environmental topics, and more.

In 2013, we rolled out the new Code and Standards to our suppliers and included guidance on how to implement these standards in their factories. The new Code and Standards became effective in January 2014, and all future audits will follow these guidelines. To make sure suppliers adhere to our Code, we have an aggressive compliance-monitoring program that includes Apple-led factory audits and corrective action plans and requires confirmation that these plans have been carried out.

We incorporate standards and frameworks created by:

Item list International labor organization, united nations, electronic industry citizenship coalition, fair labor association

Auditors discuss findings from an audit at a facility located in Suzhou, China.

How an Apple audit works

An Apple auditor leads every onsite audit, supported by local third-party auditors who are experts in their fields. Each third-party expert is trained to use Apple’s detailed auditing protocol. At each audited facility, the teams conduct physical inspections, interview workers and managers, and observe and grade suppliers based on more than 100 data points corresponding to each category of our Supplier Code of Conduct. We may also ask a supplier to immediately show us portions of a facility that are not scheduled for review. We use this data not only to ensure compliance and sustainable improvement over time, but also to consider new programs that will meet the changing needs of our suppliers and workers.

In addition to regularly scheduled audits, we conduct a number of surprise audits. In these audits, our team visits a supplier unannounced and insists on inspecting the facility within an hour of arrival. We conducted 31 surprise audits in 2013.

A Supplier Audit in Action

An Apple auditor meets with factory managers to review the day’s agenda.
Auditors inspect documents and records at an electroplating facility in Suzhou, China.
Managers at a supplier in Shanghai, China, listen to the findings of a three-day audit of their facility.

A supervisor shows auditors around a final assembly facility in Jundiaí, Brazil, near São Paulo. All final assembly manufacturers are audited annually.

Audits around the world.

Since our first audits in 2006, we’ve audited in more countries and more supplier categories. And we have expanded our audit coverage every year — far beyond our 18 final assembly facilities. We’ve now conducted audits in 16 countries, and in 2013, our 451 audits covered nearly 1.5 million workers. We audit our final assembly manufacturers every year, and we audit other facilities based on certain risk factors, including location and geographic sensitivities, past audit performance, and the nature of the facility’s work. We also perform audits in select nonproduction facilities, including call centers and warehouses. And we conduct specialized audits focusing on areas such as the environment and safety.

Some facilities that are deep in the supply chain have never been audited by Apple or other industry peers. So it is not uncommon that our audits give these companies their first opportunities to evaluate their factories against social and environmental standards. These efforts not only improve working conditions for these suppliers, but also help improve conditions industrywide, since many of our peers use the same companies.

451 the number of audits

audits in 2013 covering 1.5 million workers.

Apple Audits Since 2007

  • Repeat audits
  • First-time audits
  • 69
  • 83
  • 97
  • 106
  • 123
  • 173
  • 39
  • 83
  • 102
  • 127
  • 188
  • 298
  • 451

Core violations and corrective action.

Apple considers core violations to be the most serious breaches of compliance. These include the following: physical abuse; underage, debt-bonded, or forced labor; falsification of information or obstruction of an audit; coaching workers for audits or retaliating against them if they provide information; bribery; significant pollution and environmental impacts; and issues posing immediate threat to workers’ lives or safety. All core violations must be stopped and corrected immediately. Our preference is to correct problems rather than just fire the supplier — which in the absence of other enforcement would allow these violations to continue. However, if a violation is particularly egregious or if we believe a supplier is not fully committed to stopping the behavior, we terminate our relationship with that supplier and, when appropriate, report the behavior to the authorities. And any supplier with a core violation is placed on probation until the next re-audit — typically in one year — and may not be considered for new business until the issue is fully remediated and the probation period ends.


Auditors inspect documents and payroll records at a facility in Suzhou, China.

Integrating responsible principles into our business.

Audit data isn’t just used for corrective actions after the fact. We’re also incorporating that information directly into our product introduction processes. In 2013, we piloted a program to analyze 138 suppliers that were being considered for our new products. We evaluated the suppliers’ activities regarding the environment, health and safety, and labor and human rights. We used this analysis when making decisions about sourcing.

This program also allows us to anticipate challenges and address them before they arise. Suppliers can prepare more effectively for upcoming product launches by doing things like obtaining proper permits, reviewing emergency preparedness plans, and updating their policies on work hours and student workers. In 2014 and beyond, we’ll integrate this program further into our business.

138 the number of suppliers

suppliers reviewed for new products.